CHAINTECH GEFORCE FX 5200 128MB PRO
I know the 9500 Pro would beat the GF4400 but tie or lose to the 4600. Back when we did some benching, the 9000 came in around the mid 7,000s, the 9100 came in around the high 7's to low 8,000s, the 8500 came in around 10 -10,4++, the 9100 Pro about the high 10,000s. From previous experience the 9100 Pro would outdo the 8500 but not by too much. I guess if you want ATI you almost are going to have to go with a 9200 or 9200 Pro( I haven't even checked to see if they are available yet). The best performer out of that lot is the R9100pro, based on the same core as the R8500, with highest clocks of the lot. Radeon 9200pro: Based on RV280 275/500mhz core/memory Radeon 9200: Based on RV280 250/400mhz core/memory Radeon 9100pro: Based on RV200 275/550mhz core/memory Radeon 9100: Based on RV200 250/500mhz core/memory Radeon 9000pro: Based on RV250 275/275mhz core/memory Radeon 9000: Based on RV250 250/400mhz core/memory OK SO THIS IS THE SOFTWARE I AM USING DUMPBIOS DOS4GW NVFLASH V5. The 9200 is 8X(no big deal) as it's actually a lesser card. In fact, the 9100Pro could run with the average 4200's with NO problem.
![chaintech geforce fx 5200 128mb chaintech geforce fx 5200 128mb](https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImageCompressAll1280/14-145-095-04.jpg)
"The 9100Pro has more pixel/vertex shaders than the 9200 giving it, along with it's clocks, the edge. This is some info I posted on another thread:
![chaintech geforce fx 5200 128mb chaintech geforce fx 5200 128mb](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/w2MAAOSwlQ1h41Zh/s-l300.jpg)
I remember when it disappeared off the market like the 9500 Pros! Yes the 9000 & 9100 were ripoffs from the 8500 (which outside of the 9100 Pro) is still the best card according to a majority of users. It's easier to Google - ATI 9000 vs 9200- you'll get more quick leads to diff.